Ask the Editor is a forum on writing, style and phrasing issues that go beyond the pages of the AP Stylebook. AP Stylebook editor Paula Froke fields questions posed by subscribers to AP Stylebook Online. Below is a sampling of recent questions Paula has answered.
Click on a topic below to learn more about AP style:
First, we lowercase the word senator (and any title) when standing alone as in your example. Our style is Sen. John Doe, R-N.D., and Sen. Mary Hernandez, D-Minn. No parentheses and no postal codes.
Although a common acronym for our business writing, I'm assuming AP would say to spell out computer numerical control for CNC on first reference?
We would, yes. If it's so commonly known among your readers that spelling it out on first reference would look silly, then don't spell it out. But if at least some of your readers might not understand, then it's best to spell it out.
Hi! Thanks for the thorough AI guidance. Wondering whether you're considering allowing AI on first reference. I know style evolves (internet used to be Internet, email used to have a hyphen). So, thinking most readers will understand AI on first reference. Thanks again.
Not at this time. But certainly that's something we'd consider in the future.
Remember, a lot of people have trouble with AI without the periods, thinking we're talking about some guy named Al. And it's harder if there's not a spelled-out first reference.
Also, just because you and I understand AI on first reference doesn't mean my mom, my sister, and many other readers are as attuned.
On first reference of an interstate, do you need to put the abbreviation in parentheses as you would an acronym when it's going to be used again? For example: "Interstate 49 (I-49) will be closed at Exit 21." Or can you just say Interstate 49 on first reference and I-49 on second reference?
We don't put abbreviations in parentheses. Our style would be Interstate 49 on first reference and I-49 on second reference.
Yes, in our style it's acceptable on all references.
If that's a well known nickname for the city (Pittsburgh?) then yes, capitalize it.
Capitalize city if part of a proper name, an integral part of an official name, or a regularly used nickname: Kansas City, New York City, Windy City, City of Light, Fun City.
Lowercase elsewhere: a Texas city; the city government; the city Board of Education; and all city of phrases: the city of Boston.
Capitalize when part of a formal title before a name: City Manager Francis McGrath. Lowercase when not part of the formal title: city Health Commissioner Frank Smith.
I'm looking for guidance around articles that are part of nicknames and when AP would capitalize them. Typically, we would lowercase "the" in a composition title, for example, or in your examples given for popular names in the "capitalization" entry (e.g., the South Side, the Badlands) or the "pseudonyms, nicknames" entry (e.g., the Old Dominion). What I'm finding tricky are nicknames such as "The Rock" or "The Undertaker," as you have capped the article in your answer to a question published June 23, 2023: https://apstylebook.com/ask_the_editors/46441?sconvid=177532
In this example, which would AP prefer?
1. We spoke to the man they call "The Horse Whisperer."
2. We spoke to the man they call the "Horse Whisperer."
3. We spoke to the man they call "the Horse Whisperer."
I find this also would apply to, say, musical groups: Is it "The Beatles" or "the Beatles"? You answered a similar question in 2019, but the answer was rather "I don't really know…sometimes we do and sometimes we don't."
Many thanks to you for your input.
Well, the answer about the Beatles or The Beatles pretty much applies to this as well. I realize that's not helpful. Or maybe it is, because you don't have to feel constricted by rules, rules, rules .
Generally, though, I'd say we wouldn't capitalize The in a nickname. After all, it's a nickname, not a proper name like, well, The Beatles. So I'd go with your second option.
If you are writing about an association, and quote its president, would it be President Name said or president Name said. The association's full name would not be in front of the title. .
Capitalize the title of President when it immediately precedes a name. She said she would ask association President Peter Pringle .
But note the lowercase in this construction: She said she would ask the association president, Peter Pringle, .
My Legal department changes "the company" to "the Company" in our internal communications. For example, "We have an experienced team that works collaboratively to support the Company in its goals."
I understand it's common practice in a legal document, but we argue to no avail that it's unnecessary in an intranet story or internal email because "company" is a common noun. I see one previous similar question, but can you help us put this to rest by confirming in this example that the common noun shouldn't be capitalized? Thanks so much!
The corporate world does love its capital letters. But you are correct: In our style, the word company standing alone is lowercase because it's not a proper noun. You may be fighting a losing battle, however. It's pretty common for companies to do their own thing when it comes to capitalization. We, however, strongly agree with you.
No. Here's the entry:
When a disease is known by the name of a person or geographical area identified with it, capitalize only the proper noun element: Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Ebola virus disease, etc.
Other than in direct quotations, avoid such expressions as: He is battling cancer. She is a stroke victim. Use neutral, precise descriptions: He has stomach cancer. She had a stroke. They are being treated for malaria.
What is the accepted way to reference a decade in AP style? Is it to spell it out (ex. 1960s) or can it be shortened (ex. '60s)?
Either is fine. The longer form is more formal and the shorter more informal, so use what's appropriate for your piece and your audience.
Use Arabic figures to indicate decades of history. Use an apostrophe to indicate numerals that are left out; show plural by adding the letter s: the 1890s, the '90s, the Gay '90s, the 1920s, the mid-1930s
I have a question that is driving me crazy. Here is the sentence in question:
The event will begin with a social hour and cash bar, followed by dinner at 6:30 p.m. Cavigelli’s presentation will start at 7, followed by a live auction at 7:30.
The director of this event wanted :00 after 7. When I explained that that was not AP Style, she responded with an email that included a photo of her 2017 AP Stylebook and this comment: “My copy doesn’t specify that 7:00 is objectionable. Please list it as either p.m. or :00.”
Help! Which is correct, per AP?
There's a line between following AP style to the letter, and doing what's necessary to keep the customer satisfied (within reason).
It's true that we don't say 7:00 is objectionable. But when we say our style is 7 p.m., it's implied that our style is not 7:00 p.m.
The good news: She gave the option of including p.m. and I think that's a reasonable option. In our heart of hearts, we think the p.m. is pretty apparent (the presentation wouldn't start at 7 a.m. following a 6:30 p.m. dinner). But including the p.m. dresses up the stand-alone 7 a bit and wouldn't strike most people as odd.
The event will begin with a social hour and cash bar, followed by dinner at 6:30 p.m. Cavigelli’s presentation will start at 7 p.m., followed by a live auction at 7:30 p.m.
Or if the organizers are really in love with :00, then go with it. We need flexibility .
Would there be a comma after 2021 in this: "between February 1, 2021 and February 22, 2023, the . "
Thanks.
Yes, a comma after 2021. Also: In AP style, we abbreviate most months when used with a date. So our style is: between Feb. 1, 2021, and Feb. 22, 2023, the .
I see your entry on time but would like clarification. Which style would be best for this type of sentence: Join us from 9-11 a.m. OR Join us 9-11 a.m.
I typically like to use "from" and "to" when I use one or another. But I also like sticking to your style and using a hyphen. The "from" in the first example seems to make the sentence flow better.
Yes: Join us from 9-11 a.m. But, we also are just fine with no hyphen. See the end of the below section from the times entry. So you easily could write: Join us from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.
Use figures except for noon and midnight. Use a colon to separate hours from minutes: 11 a.m., 1 p.m., 3:30 p.m., 9-11 a.m., 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Is it necessary to include the year on an invitation for an upcoming event if it's obvious the event is in the current year?
Example: You are invited to attend the Christmas Pageant on Friday, December 16. or You are invited to attend the Christmas Pageant on Friday, December 16, 2022.
Don't include the year if it's the current year. Here's the entry:
When a phrase refers to a month and day within the current year, do not include the year: The hearing is scheduled for June 26. If the reference is to a past or future year, include the year and set it off with commas: Feb. 14, 2025, is the target date. Use an s without an apostrophe to indicate spans of decades or centuries: the 1890s, the 1800s.
Years are an exception to the general rule in numerals that a figure is not used to start a sentence: 2013 was a very good year.
In legal and technical writing, I sometime see numbers spelled out followed by the Arabic numeral in parenthesis, e.g., fifteen (15) units. This seems anachronistic to me. What is the correct usage?
We don't do that in AP style. Other style guides might call for it in some types of writing. There's no "correct" usage. It's a matter of which style you follow.
Does the numerals in headlines rule apply to ordinals?
"For Tesla's futuristic new Cybertruck, a fourth recall"
— Use numerals; do not spell out numbers except in casual uses or formal names: hundreds instead of 100s; Big Ten; one of the first. Spell out ordinals under 10: first, ninth, etc. But: 10th, 23rd, 104th.
Can you start a sentence with the numeral with the word million such as.
“$44 million to treat an operation.
or do you write it out. "Forty-four million dollars to treat an operation.
We spell out numbers when they start a sentence. But it's much better to rephrase to avoid that situation. Assuming it's not exactly $44 million: about $44 million, at least $44 million, almost $44 million, more than $44 million ... whichever is accurate could be used to start the sentence.
How would you talk about the data mentioned in this sentence? "We adjusted the original adult definition of complexity from adults with > 4 out of 10 specified health conditions to adults with >4 out of 8 conditions."
Would you keep the symbols?
We use figures for ratios (1 in 4 voters). But I wouldn't consider your example a ratio. So I'd use words: adults with more than four of eight conditions. And we definitely wouldn't use the > symbol.
This is one the silliest work arguments ever. For Star Wars Day (ugh), the correct style would be "May the Fourth be with you" because numbers less than 10 are spelled out, right?
I can see how this would turn into a work argument; I'm sure it would turn into a Stylebook team argument as well, if I were to raise it with the rest of the team. But I'm going to go it alone on this one.
Yes, we spell out numbers under 10 in general. But there are lots of exceptions.
We also generally spell out ordinals (such as fourth) but there are exceptions to that, as well. Dates aren't listed as an exception because we typically don't write May 4th (instead, just May 4.) See below for that section of the numerals entry.
I think I'd go with May the 4th be with you. That's in keeping with our general guidance on dates. It's also how the Star Wars folks style it themselves.
Numbers used to indicate order (first, second, 10th, 25th, etc.) are called ordinal numbers. Generally spell out first through ninth: fourth grade, first base, the First Amendment, he was first in line. Use figures starting with 10th. Use figures for ages: 4th birthday. Also: 3rd Congressional District; 2nd Precinct.
"A group of Republicans in Congress has/have introduced a proposal"?
Does the answer depend on whether the subject of the sentence is "group" or "Republicans" (and in that case which is it)? Or is the answer determined by whichever word is closest to the verb?
A group . has proposed. Yes, the subject is group and that dictates the singular verb.
Hello, my question is concerning comma usage in when introducing poem, book, and podcast episode titles. I've searched your site and have not come across clear direction, and appreciate any clarity you can provide using the examples below:
When introducing a poem title:
Option A
Benjamin Gucciardi reads his poem, "The Rungs."
Option B
Benjamin Gucciardi reads his poem "The Rungs."
And in referencing the episode title of a podcast:
Option A
This poem was featured in Benjamin's conversation with April, "The Poetry We're Reading Now."
Option B
These fall under the category of essential or nonessential phrases. Read the full entry for details.
In your first example, the answer depends on whether Gucciardi has one poem, or more than one. If he has only one poem, the name of the title is nonessential and thus the comma is used. If he has more than one poem, the name of this one is essential and there is no comma in that construction.
In your second example, it depends on whether he has only one conversation with April. In that case, use the comma.
If he has more than one conversation with April, no comma.
I know this can be confusing. But I think the entry spells it out reasonably well.
Question about a subhed in a news story. Wording as published is:
On Florida’s Gulf Coast, a loose coalition of activists, officials and Trumpworld celebrities is building the world they want to live in
Seems odd to me to have to use a singular verb for coalition when the sentence is clearly about many people and the world they want to live in. Certainly it wouldn't be the world it wants to live in. Are there exceptions to the singular rule for certain constructions using words like coalition?
I have pages of notes about this, focusing on the concept of notional agreement and the principle of proximity. Grammarians have differing views. We don't address it thoroughly in the Stylebook, yet. But in short: You'd have plenty of support in using the plural are for the verb. I'm among those in support.
I would love to get your thoughts on a question that comes up frequently at my organization regarding the use of the word "talent." The answer to this question is helpful, but suppose for reasons outside your control you needed to use this word to refer to multiple individuals. Which of the following examples would you prefer?
These three talents have the strongest performance. (Pluralize talent with an "s")
These three talent has the strongest performance. (Collective noun taking singular verb--this seems weird.)
These three talent have the strongest performance. (Treat plural of "talent" like "deer")
Could you possibly let the people outside your control know that the AP Stylebook editor strongly (VERY strongly) recommends against this use, and can't find support for it in major dictionaries? There's a distinct fingernails-on-chalkboard effect. I could go on. And on and on.
OK, but if you have to use it, I guess I'd choose the first option. Definitely not the second. Maybe the third. It's hard to say what correct usage is for something that's not correct usage however you do it .
"Their passion and focus on agriculture are evident and apparent."
Ignoring any other potential problems with this sentence, my proofreading team feels the "are" should be changed to "is." It sounds really odd to us otherwise. However, when two nouns are joined by "and," the verb should be plural. Is "are" here incorrect? Would you change it? (Assuming rewording isn't an option.)
It depends on on whether you view passion and focus as one concept (taking a singular verb) or two distinct concepts (taking a plural verb). In your example, I agree that the are simply sounds odd (not that sounds odd is a technical term, but it matters). And certainly passion and focus can be viewed as one concept. So I agree: Use the singular is.
On another note, I question whether you need both evident and apparent. How about one or the other? The two together are redundant. (Maybe that's one of your other potential problems!)
Is it grammatically correct to use two colons in one sentence? For example, the following is a line from an article I'm editing: "You'll understand once you read this article: Everything you need to know: Scoring [test name] for your students."
I don't know if there's any specific rule against it. But I sure wouldn't do it. It makes the reader's head spin. I don't even know what that sentence means!
When ending a sentence or clause with an acronym such as a.m. or U.S.A., should one use two periods or just one?
For example, should one use "He went to the U.S.A.." or "He went to the U.S.A." ?
Just one period.
When it comes to bulleted (or dashed) lists, each item takes punctuation, usually a period. I'm wondering if this same rule applies on a résumé, specifically in the Education section. This is the only bulleted section my client doesn't have punctuation:
I think periods are necessary here if for no other reason than consistency. Your input please and thank yoU!
We changed our guidance on lists, bulleted lists this year: We now don't use a period after a phrase or a single word. So in your example, no periods.
AP uses dashes instead of bullets to introduce individual sections of a list in news stories, but may use bullets in other formats. Put a space between the dash or bullet and the first word of each item in the list. Capitalize the first word following the dash or bullet.
Use periods at the end of each sentence in a bulleted list. Use no punctuation at the end of a single word or single phrase in each section of a list. Do not use semicolons.
Use parallel construction for each item in a list:Examples of phrases with no punctuation at the end:
Introduce the list with a short phrase or sentence: Our partners: or These are our partners: or Our partners are:
In the prefixes entry, the rules for "anti-" words state: "Note a number of exceptions. They include," implying that the list isn't exhaustive. Is anti-competitive still hyphenated, or should we follow Merriam-Webster's spelling?
The list indeed isn't exhaustive. But if a word isn't on the list, generally assume that we don't hyphenate it. (On the other hand, if you prefer the hyphen, that's OK too.) In this case, both we and M-W use anticompetitive.
What is the correct punctuation for these sentences: He arrived with his wife, Emma. They celebrated their wedding anniversary and the college graduation of their daughter, Jordyn. Are commas necessary between "wife" and "Emma" and "daughter" and "Jordyn"?
The comma is needed if Emma is his only wife (presumably, she is). If Jordyn is their only daughter, the comma is needed. In those cases, the names are nonessential phrases and thus a comma is necessary.
If they have more than one daughter (let's say, Jordyn and EmmaSue), then the name becomes an essential phrase and no comma is used.
I know this sounds confusing! Details are in the essential phrases, nonessential phrases entry.
Can you please clarify?
We have one style; Merriam-Webster has another. Either can be correct. Choose the one you prefer. (We are generally, but not always, in synch with our primary dictionary. That's always been the case.)
The official stylebook entry for FAQ says just that — FAQ. That entry was created in 2002. But an Ask the Editor response from 2020 says FAQs. Which is correct? Thanks in advance.
It's FAQ for one set of questions/answers: Please read the FAQ on track racing. If you have separate FAQs on different topics, it's FAQs: Please read the FAQs on track racing and mountain bike racing.
Our style is PFAS for both the singular and plural. Here's the entry.
AP has changed guidance on using hyphens in anti constructions but has a number of exceptions. Should it be anti-tumor and anti-cancer, or antitumor and anticancer?
Our style is antitumor and anticancer, which is our general style for anti- and is the style used by Merriam-Webster for both of those.
Hi Paula and the AP Team,
Meriam-Webster closes both "countrywide" and "citywide". In a document that uses both words, how would you style "Kingdom wide" as a postpositive adjective?
Kingdom wide
Kingdomwide
Kingdom-wide
Thank you!
Note the second part of that section of the suffixes entry. Could you rephrase?
-wide No hyphen for commonly recognized terms such as citywide, countywide, statewide, storewide, worldwide. But use a hyphen — or don’t use the construction at all — when combining with a proper noun and/or when the unhyphenated form would be awkward or hard to read, such as hospitalwide, NASAwide, Europewide. Often, it’s better to rephrase.
Technical question: Did you change the rules regarding a hyphen before like as a suffix? The -like entry doesn't come up when I search for it, but it comes up in answers to questions about it. Thanks!
For what is intended to be cohesiveness and ease of use, previous individual entries for suffixes have been combined into one suffixes entry. Same with prefixes. Unfortunately, searching for an individual prefix or suffix doesn't take you immediately to the umbrella entry. I'm asking if there's a way to fix that. In the meantime, from the suffixes entry:
-like Generally no hyphen unless the letter l would be tripled or the main element is a proper noun. Examples: businesslike, catlike, childlike, doglike, lifelike. But: Norwalk-like, shell-like. An exception: flu-like.
I work in the energy industry. Based on recent change for prefixes, would it be subSaharan (conflicting with June 2023 guidance) and semisubmersible rig? Also, a jackup rig? Thanks.
It's sub-Saharan, following this unchanged guidance from the prefixes entry:
Three rules are constant:
And: semisubmersible. Merriam-Webster hyphenates jack-up for the rig and we will follow the dictionary lead on that.
Hi. The examples you provide in your newest prefix guidance on when to use a hyphen after "half" and when not to are helpful. But it's hard to decide whether to use a hyphen in other cases. Can you explain the thinking behind these? And specifically, would you use "half mile" or "half-mile"?
half- is included in the list under this header, which you may have missed in the overall prefixes entry:
Generally use a hyphen with these prefixes unless listed without a hyphen in Merriam-Webster:
So, half-mile, following the guidance in that header for a term not listed without a hyphen in Merriam-Webster.
As for what the thinking was: It was an extraordinarily painstaking process melding our existing guidance, Merriam-Webster and common usage. Prefixes and suffixes are a messy bunch. As you know from the half- entry, that one in particular is fraught.
Generally use a hyphen with these prefixes unless listed without a hyphen in Merriam-Webster:
half- Hyphenated combinations include half-baked, half-life, half-truth, half-moon, half-cocked, half-hearted (the latter a 2024 change). Two-word combinations without a hyphen include half dozen, half brother, half off. One word, no hyphen, for some words including halfback, halftone.
Also: halftime as a noun, in keeping with widespread practice in sports copy. But half-time as an adjective outside sports contexts.